Assembled from the record
History, examination findings, medications, allergies, relevant results and imaging pulled into the receiving service's own template, with the mandatory fields checked before it is allowed to leave.
Use case · Referral Automation
Outbound referrals assembled from the chart, authorised, sent and then chased until the report returns — with the loop closed in the record and the patient told at every step.
In the product
Referral 7734 — gastroenterology
TrackingRaised 09:12 · Dr Whelan · suspected coeliac disease · routine
Packet assembled: history, tTG-IgA 128 U/mL, FBC, current medications
Template check: receiving service requires IgA level — present ✓
Primum
Authorisation submitted to plan · EDI 278 · reference AX-44192
Authorisation approved 11:40 · attached to packet · referral transmitted 11:44
Acknowledged by service 14:02 · appointment date pending, clock set 15 days
Primum
SMS to patient: referral sent and accepted, you'll hear about a date within three weeks.
Case timeline
Case open · next chase day 15 if no date · patient notified 11:46
Overview
The referral letter goes out and then it enters a gap nobody owns. Did the consultant accept it? Did the patient get a date? Did they attend? Did the report come back, and did anybody read it? Each of those questions takes a phone call, so in practice none of them get asked until the patient rings to complain.
Primum builds the referral from the chart, checks it against the receiving service's own requirements before it leaves, obtains the authorisation, sends it, and then keeps the case open until the report is filed. The patient is told when the referral was sent, when it was accepted, and when a date exists — and the practice sees anything that stops moving.
Capabilities
Every one of them is a place where somebody has to make a phone call. That is the work being taken away.
History, examination findings, medications, allergies, relevant results and imaging pulled into the receiving service's own template, with the mandatory fields checked before it is allowed to leave.
Prior authorisation requested and tracked over EDI 278, with the determination attached to the referral, so nothing arrives at a consultant's office to be sent back for a reference number.
No acknowledgement in five days, no appointment date in fifteen, no report in twenty-one — each of those is a trigger that makes a call rather than an alert nobody clears.
The returned report is matched to the original referral, filed, coded, and put in front of the referring clinician with the question they originally asked restated.
How it works
One case, open from the moment the clinician decides to refer until the answer is in the record.
01
Triggered by the clinician's decision, with the service and the urgency chosen from your own directory and the patient's cover.
Directory + plan match
02
Clinical content built from the chart into the receiving template and checked against its mandatory fields, with imaging and results attached.
Template validated
03
Prior authorisation requested and tracked, then the referral transmitted over the channel that service accepts — direct message, portal, fax bridge or API.
EDI 278 + secure send
04
Acknowledgement, date and report each tracked on a clock. The report is filed to the chart, coded, and surfaced to the referring clinician.
Loop closure
01
Triggered by the clinician's decision, with the service and the urgency chosen from your own directory and the patient's cover.
Directory + plan match
02
Clinical content built from the chart into the receiving template and checked against its mandatory fields, with imaging and results attached.
Template validated
03
Prior authorisation requested and tracked, then the referral transmitted over the channel that service accepts — direct message, portal, fax bridge or API.
EDI 278 + secure send
04
Acknowledgement, date and report each tracked on a clock. The report is filed to the chart, coded, and surfaced to the referring clinician.
Loop closure
Benefits
The leakage in a referral pathway is almost entirely administrative.
Referrals validated against the receiving service's requirements are not returned for missing information, which is the single largest cause of a restarted wait.
Silence triggers a chase. A referral that has not been acknowledged in five days becomes a call rather than a patient complaint in eight weeks.
Reports come back matched to the question that was asked, so the clinician sees the finding and the original reason for referral together.
In practice
All four failure modes, handled before anybody noticed them.
Packet assembled, authorisation not required, transmitted the same morning, and the patient called to confirm they know what to expect.
The template requires a recent ECG. The referral is held, the ECG is booked for the next day, and the packet goes out complete.
No date from the receiving service. Two chases logged, escalation to the practice manager with the full history attached.
A dermatology report lands in a shared inbox. It is matched to the referral, coded, and put on the referring GP's list with the original question restated.
Give us a quarter of outbound referrals. We will tell you how many were acknowledged, how many produced a report, and how many are sitting somewhere between the two with nobody chasing them.