Specialty · Pain Management

Opioid reviews that happen on schedule, every time.

Structured pain and function assessment, controlled-substance monitoring with the checks your policy requires, tapering support, and procedure follow-up — with cauda equina questions on every contact.

98%
Controlled-substance reviews on schedule
< 45s
Cauda equina features to escalation
2.7x
Function scores captured per patient

In the product

Pain service — review 8841

Escalated
  1. Outbound 13:05 · Colm R. · 49 · oxycodone MR 20mg bd · review due

  2. Primum

    Before the review questions — any change in bladder or bowel control, or numbness between your legs when you sit down?

  3. Caller

    Now that you say it, the last few days it's been numb when I sit on the toilet. And I've had to wait to start going.

  4. Saddle anaesthesia + urinary hesitancy → cauda equina criteria met, review suspended

  5. Primum

    That combination needs to be assessed today. I'm arranging emergency assessment now and the spinal team is being contacted — don't wait to see if it settles.

  6. Review deferred · emergency pathway opened · prescriber notified

Review record

Regimen
Oxycodone MR 20mg bd
Saddle sensation
Reduced, 3 days
Bladder
Hesitancy reported
Criteria
Cauda equina — emergency
Review
Suspended
Spinal team
Contacted 13:08

Emergency assessment arranged · prescriber informed · review rescheduled

A routine opioid review interrupted by a spinal emergency

Overview

The review that gets skipped is the one the policy depends on.

  • Pain and function scored with the same instruments at every contact, so the trend is real.
  • Controlled-substance obligations met on schedule rather than when a slot appears.
  • Cauda equina and other spinal emergencies screened on every contact, without exception.

Controlled-substance prescribing carries obligations: regular review, function as well as pain, agreement compliance, database checks, and a documented rationale for continuing. Every one of those takes a clinic appointment that a busy service cannot always find, so the prescription is reissued and the review slides another month.

Primum runs those reviews as structured contacts. Pain and function are scored with the same instruments each time, agreement terms are checked, aberrant patterns are surfaced rather than smoothed over, and the prescriber sees a decision with the trend attached. Tapering is supported with contact at the intervals that make it survivable, and cauda equina questions are asked on every single call.

Capabilities

Four things a pain service has to keep doing

Three are obligations. One is an emergency that presents as ordinary back pain.

  • Cauda equina, asked every time

    Saddle anaesthesia, bladder or bowel disturbance, bilateral leg symptoms and progressive weakness screened on every contact regardless of the reason for the call, with immediate escalation on any positive finding.

  • Pain and function, both

    Numerical pain scores alongside functional measures — what the patient can do now that they could not, or can no longer do — so decisions rest on function rather than on a single number.

  • The monitoring your policy requires

    Agreement compliance, prescription database checks, toxicology scheduling, early-request patterns and lost-prescription frequency, all surfaced with the history rather than reported as isolated events.

  • Tapering that people survive

    Contact at each step down, with withdrawal symptoms, sleep, mood and function tracked, and the ability to hold a step rather than abandon the taper when it gets difficult.

How it works

A controlled-substance review, done properly

The same structure every time, which is what makes the trend worth reading.

  • Arrives
  • Decided
  • Done
  • Returned
  1. 01

    Review due

    Triggered by the prescribing interval, with the current regimen, agreement terms and last review loaded.

    Interval trigger

  2. 02

    Red flags screened

    Cauda equina and progressive neurological features asked first, on every contact, before the review itself begins.

    Spinal red flags

  3. 03

    Scored and checked

    Pain, function, side effects, adherence and agreement compliance captured, with database and early-request patterns evaluated.

    Instrument + policy

  4. 04

    Decision prepared

    Continue, adjust, taper or review in person, with the trend, the evidence and the rationale assembled for the prescriber to sign.

    Prescriber decision

Benefits

Compliance and care improve together

Which is rare — usually one is bought at the expense of the other.

  • The documented review exists

    Every continuation has a scored assessment, a compliance check and a rationale behind it. That is what an audit asks for.

  • Function is visible over time

    A patient whose pain score is unchanged but who has stopped leaving the house is a different clinical problem, and the trend makes it visible.

  • Tapers finish more often

    Contact at each step, and permission to hold one, is the difference between a completed taper and an abandoned one.

In practice

Four pain service contacts

The first has nothing to do with the review it was booked for.

  • Numbness when sitting

    Emergency in 40s

    Mentioned during a routine review. Saddle anaesthesia with urinary hesitancy meets criteria and emergency assessment is arranged immediately.

  • Early request, third time

    Flagged with history

    Pattern surfaced with the previous two requests and the database check, and routed to the prescriber rather than reissued.

  • Taper step 4 of 8

    Held one cycle

    Sleep and mood deteriorating. The step is held rather than abandoned, with a further contact in two weeks.

  • Post-injection, day 3

    Reassured

    Expected post-procedure flare with no red flags. Advice given and the next review confirmed.

Audit your review interval

Ask how many controlled-substance patients have a documented, scored review inside the interval your policy states. We will run one month of them and show you the difference.